|
Useful Links |
|
|
Article Details :: |
|
|
| Article Name : | | | THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE | | Author Name : | | | SHRIKANT YELEGAONKAR | | Publisher : | | | Ashok Yakkaldevi | | Article Series No. : | | | GRT-5454 | | Article URL : | |  | Author Profile View PDF In browser | | Abstract : | | | Inside the order of political science in the United States, traditionalism, behavioralism, and postbehavioralism are three unmistakable political science research approaches. That is, every offers a viewpoint on how best to do examination, investigation, and clarification identifying with governmental issues and political life (Dryzek & Leonard, 1988). These three methodologies speak to distinctive purposes of accentuation in regards to the routes in which investigate about governmental issues ought to continue. For instance, it will be seen that traditionalism—in correlation with behavioralism—has a tendency to accentuate the handiness of dissecting administrative foundations when examining political phenomena, while behavioralism has a tendency to attest the significance of examination into the intricacies of the conduct of individual political performing artists (e.g., subjects, lobbyists, hopefuls, chose authorities). Then again, every one of the three examination points of view impart the conviction that political science exploration ought to create clarifications that enhance and develop our comprehension of complex political courses of action. | | Keywords : | | - political administration,
|
|
|